Important Disclosures
UPDATE — 10 SEPTEMBER 2026. The provider has withdrawn this EA's MQL5 signal. That day its address returned "signal is disabled and unavailable." Every performance figure in this review was recorded while that signal was public, and none of it can be re-checked against the original public signal. We have left the figures published rather than delete them, because removing them would conceal what we assessed and why, but they are a historical record only. We do not treat withdrawal as evidence against the product: closing a signal is a business decision, not a performance failure.
Verification History
13 August 2026 — initial assessment. 310 trades, 75.48% win rate, 1.43 profit factor, 33.76% maximum drawdown by balance and 33.01% by equity, 0.77 recovery factor, 0.15 Sharpe, 24 weeks verified history. Signal already closed to new subscriptions at this point.
10 September 2026 — final reading. 330 trades, 76.36% win rate, maximum drawdown unchanged at 33.76%, growth 68.94%, monthly growth −23.52%, annual forecast −100.00%, equity 667.38 EUR on 223.43 EUR profit. The annual forecast is MQL5's mechanical extrapolation of one bad month, not a measurement.
10 September 2026 — signal withdrawn. Later the same day, the signal became unavailable entirely. No further verification is possible.
This re-verification also corrected an error in our original review. We had described third-party marketing as "materially misleading" for quoting 7.8% drawdown against our recorded 33.76%, without disclosing that the signal we assessed was the developer's High Risk preset, calibrated for up to around 35%. That comparison was not like for like, and the correction is reflected throughout this page.
25 September 2026 — editorial correction. No figures were re-measured and the verdict is unchanged. A line describing the MQL5-monitored record as "the seller's own numbers" was corrected, and a statement about how many of our reviews currently carry a Recommended verdict was removed, because it would silently become false as new reviews publish.
28 October 2026 — verdict changed from Inconclusive to Not Recommended.
- The rule: on 28 October 2026 we adopted a rule that any grid, averaging, martingale or recovery strategy is Not Recommended, whether disclosed or not, and that where no trade history can be read, the developer's own description of the default decides. Wave Rider's default mode is Recovery (Grid); our 13 August review recorded the signal running it. No figures were re-measured.
- Re-read the same day: the product page (299 USD, 499 regular; version 6.10, updated 21 October 2026), the developer's manual (2 March 2026) and a new linked signal, 2391460 (5 weeks and 31 trades, too short to assess). The signal we assessed is no longer publicly available: MQL5 said it was not found.
- Wording corrected: the 10 September entry above describes the annual forecast as an extrapolation of "one bad month"; it is a platform projection, not an observed return. Preset selection is a possible explanation of the 7.8% figure discussed below, not an established one: we have not established the source of the figure. We also removed a starting equity of about 445 EUR that we had inferred, which MQL5 did not show.
- Layout: the page was moved to our current review layout. The old "what would change this verdict" conditions were replaced, because they were written for an Inconclusive verdict.
What would change this verdict.
- While the default is a grid: while Wave Rider's default mode is a grid recovery, it is Not Recommended under our methodology, whatever its profit.
- Single Position mode: this mode could be reviewed on its own once a real-money record of it reaches 12 months and 300 closed trades: an Early Review, which cannot be Recommended. A Full Review, which can, needs 24 months. Either would be a fresh review against all our criteria.
- A new default: a version whose default mode has no grid, with an attributable real-money record of at least 12 months and 300 closed trades showing no grid, averaging, martingale or recovery strategy, would need a fresh review on the same terms.
Marketing and preset disclosure: At least one third-party reseller markets this EA as showing a 7.8% maximum drawdown, without stating which risk configuration that figure refers to. The developer publishes three calibrated presets, targeting roughly 10%, 15–20%, and up to around 35% drawdown respectively. The signal we assessed was his High Risk preset, which recorded 33.76% over 24 weeks to 13 August 2026. The gap between those two numbers is therefore explained by preset selection, not by concealment on the developer's part. We flag it because a single drawdown figure published without naming its preset is incomplete, and a buyer comparing 7.8% against a High Risk track record would be misled by omission. We could not confirm the developer made the 7.8% claim himself — it does not appear in his own product description. (Note, 28 October 2026: preset selection is a possible explanation; we have not established the source of the 7.8% figure.)
This EA's evidence was a live, independently-monitored MQL5 Signal, not a self-reported backtest. We pulled the official signal statistics directly rather than relying on third-party figures. We did not independently re-verify trade-by-trade execution or broker conditions, and we did not purchase or run the EA ourselves. The reference account was small — under 700 EUR equity at its final reading — which limits how far its record demonstrates behaviour at larger account sizes. Past performance, including verified live performance, is not a guarantee of future results.
Affiliate Disclosure: The Robotic Trader has no affiliate or referral relationship with this EA or its developer. We earn nothing whether you buy it or not.
Corrections. If you are the vendor and believe a figure here is wrong, contact us at
[email protected] with the evidence; we will check it and record any change in the verification history above.
Risk warning. Trading foreign exchange and contracts for difference carries a high level of risk and can result in the loss of all invested capital. Automated trading does not remove that risk; it removes the delay between a decision and its execution. Past performance, including verified past performance, is not a reliable indicator of future results. Nothing in this review is financial advice, a personal recommendation, or an invitation to trade. We are an independent publisher, not a regulated financial adviser.
Is Wave Rider EA a scam?
We have seen no evidence of fraud, and we do not call it one. The developer describes the grid openly and published a live MQL5 signal while we assessed it. Our verdict is about the risk of a grid strategy, not about honesty.
Can I still verify the figures in this review?
No. The signal is no longer publicly available: it was withdrawn on 10 September 2026, and when we read its address on 28 October 2026, MQL5 said it was not found. The signal's figures on this page were recorded while it was public, and we keep them as a dated record, but they cannot be re-checked against the original public signal.
Why is Wave Rider rated Not Recommended?
Because its default mode is a grid. In Recovery (Grid) mode, which the developer sets as the default, it adds positions to a trade that has moved against it and closes the group together once the average moves into profit. As we recorded on 13 August 2026, the signal we assessed ran that mode; it was withdrawn before we read its trade history, so the verdict rests on the default the developer publishes. Our methodology rates any grid, averaging, martingale or recovery strategy Not Recommended, disclosed or not. The verdict does not cover the Single Position mode, which has no live record we could assess.
Why did the verdict change from Inconclusive?
On 28 October 2026 we adopted the rule that any grid or recovery strategy is Not Recommended, and we apply rule changes to published reviews straight away. Before that, Wave Rider was Inconclusive: it passed the checklist we then used, under which a disclosed grid was not a fail, but its record was short and weak, with a recovery factor of 0.77. No figures were re-measured for the change.
Does the signal being withdrawn mean the EA has failed?
No, and we won't imply otherwise. Providers close signals for many reasons, such as subscription management, account changes or a move to a different broker. We do not know why this one was withdrawn. Withdrawal is a business decision, not a performance result. It does mean the evidence behind our assessment can no longer be checked, which is why we flag it at the top of the page. It played no part in the verdict.
Does Wave Rider use a grid strategy?
By default, yes, and the developer says so in detail: on the product page, which calls Recovery (Grid) the "Default mode", and in his manual. The EA also offers a Single Position mode with a fixed stop loss and take profit and no grid, which the product page calls "Prop firm friendly". As we recorded on 13 August 2026, the signal we assessed ran the grid mode at its High Risk setting.
What was the real maximum drawdown of Wave Rider?
It depends which preset you run. In August 2026 the developer published three risk levels targeting roughly 10%, 15–20% and up to around 35% drawdown. The signal we assessed ran the High Risk preset and recorded 33.76% by balance and 33.01% by equity over 24 weeks to 13 August 2026, still unchanged at our final reading on 10 September. A 7.8% figure circulating in third-party marketing does not state which preset it refers to. A newer signal linked in October 2026 showed 6.14% by equity after 5 weeks, too short to assess.
How much does Wave Rider cost?
On 28 October 2026 the product page listed it at 299 USD, marked "VERY LIMITED PRICE (6 licenses left)", against 499 USD regular. On 10 September it was 399 USD. Prices on the MQL5 Market change often, so check the official product page.
What account size does Wave Rider need?
The developer states a minimum deposit of $300 at 0.01 lot, and recommends $800 or more for comfortable grid recovery. Single Position mode, which runs no grid, needs less: around $150 at 0.01 lot. The signal we assessed had under 700 EUR equity at our final reading.
What instrument does Wave Rider trade?
The developer recommends gold (XAUUSD), and the signal we assessed traded gold on VTMarkets at 1:500 leverage. That was the account the signal ran on, not a requirement of the EA.